Menu
The Whisperer in Darkness Poster

The Whisperer in Darkness

In the deepest woods of the most remote hills... a dark mystery BEYOND BELIEF!
2011 | 104m | English

(3934 votes)

TMDb IMDb

Popularity: 2 (history)

Details

Folklore professor Albert Wilmarth investigates legends of strange creatures in the most remote hills of Vermont. His enquiry reveals a terrifying glimpse of the truth that lurks behind the legends.
Release Date: Mar 12, 2011
Director: Sean Branney
Writer: H.P. Lovecraft, Andrew Leman
Genres: Science Fiction, Horror, Mystery, Thriller
Keywords black and white, lovecraftian
Production Companies HPLHS
Box Office Revenue: $0
Budget: $0
Updates Updated: Feb 01, 2025
Entered: Apr 17, 2024
Trailers and Extras

Backdrops

International Posters

No images available.

Full Credits

Name Character
Matt Foyer Albert Wilmarth
Autumn Wendel Hannah Masterson
Stephen Blackehart Charlie Tower
Barry Lynch Henry Akeley
Matt Lagan Nathaniel Ward
Paul Ita Farmer
Andrew Leman Charles Fort
Annie Abrams Aviatrix
Lance J. Holt Davis Bradbury
Joe Sofranko George Akeley
David Pavao Jordan Lowell
Daniel Kaemon P. F. Noyes
Martin Wately Walter Brown
Caspar Marsh Will Masterson
Sean Branney B-67
Zack Gold Astronomer
John Jabaley Superintendent
Name Job
H.P. Lovecraft Writer
Sean Branney Director
Andrew Leman Writer
Name Title
Organization Category Person
Popularity Metrics

Popularity History


Year Month Avg Max Min
2024 4 6 10 4
2024 5 7 11 4
2024 6 8 26 4
2024 7 7 13 4
2024 8 6 12 4
2024 9 5 9 4
2024 10 8 19 5
2024 11 6 11 4
2024 12 6 10 3
2025 1 5 8 4
2025 2 5 8 3
2025 3 4 7 3
2025 4 1 1 1
2025 5 1 1 1
2025 6 1 1 1
2025 7 0 0 0
2025 8 0 2 0
2025 9 1 1 0
2025 10 2 3 1
2025 11 2 2 2

Trending Position


No trending metrics available.

Return to Top

Reviews

dalboz
5.0

"The Call of Cthulhu" by the H.P. Lovecraft Historical Society was an absolutely sublime film. Making it a black-and-white silent film to appear as though it were made in the '20s-'30s was a stroke of genius, and the film stays very close to the source material without being boring. So when it was a ... nnounced that they were doing a follow-up film, adapting Lovecraft "The Whisperer in Darkness," I was beside myself with joy to the point of being giddy. Unfortunately, "The Whisperer in Darkness" fails to live up to the high water mark left by "The Call of Cthulhu." Instead of a silent film, this one is done more in the style of a '50s black-and-white horror film. While I don't take issue with the style they chose, they still make some very odd choices that left me feeling a little cold and at times saying, "Huh?" So, where does the problem arise? I started to wonder if I remembered the original story correctly. Then realized that I had. They not only make adjustments to the story, but treat the story as only acts one and two, creating a completely original third act. While I understand the adaptation aspect of movies and am more tolerant than many seem to be because I understand that a direct one-to-one translation of most literary works to the screen would, well, suck, the change in tone in the third act is enough to give the audience whiplash. The final act goes straight into traditional horror and action that seems like something more out of the Call of Cthulhu RPG as opposed to the slow-burning weird fiction of the unknowable that Lovecraft is most well known for. This leaves us with one of the most inconsistent movies I've seen in recent memory. The tonal change is so drastic that it's clear the different parts of the film were written in two completely disparate time periods. As such, this film is kind of a let down after "The Call of Cthulhu." I strongly recommend seeing that one over "The Whisperer in Darkness" and only recommend this one for hardcore Lovecraft fans.

Jun 23, 2021