Menu
Carnal Knowledge Poster

Carnal Knowledge

Its time has come.
1971 | 98m | English

(16688 votes)

TMDb IMDb

Popularity: 1 (history)

Director: Mike Nichols
Writer: Jules Feiffer
Staring:
Details

Two lifelong friends navigate complex sexual encounters and emotional entanglements, wrestling with societal norms and personal desires.
Release Date: Jun 30, 1971
Director: Mike Nichols
Writer: Jules Feiffer
Genres: Comedy, Drama, Romance
Keywords new york city, infidelity, eroticism, friends, coming of age, extramarital affair, sexual confusion, sexual awakening, college friends, college roommate, comedy of manners
Production Companies AVCO Embassy Pictures
Box Office Revenue: $28,623,900
Budget: $5,000,000
Updates Updated: Feb 04, 2026
Entered: Apr 13, 2024
Trailers

Extras

International Posters

Full Credits

Name Character
Jack Nicholson Jonathan
Candice Bergen Susan
Art Garfunkel Sandy
Ann-Margret Bobbie
Rita Moreno Louise
Cynthia O'Neal Cindy
Carol Kane Jennifer
Sheri Jackson Mama
Name Job
Mike Nichols Director
Sydney Guilaroff Hairstylist
Jules Feiffer Screenplay
Robert Schultz Property Master
Piero Servo First Assistant Camera
Stu Linder Editorial Production Assistant
Robert Luthardt Art Direction
Meta Rebner Script Supervisor
Tim Zinnemann Assistant Director
Clyde Hart Key Grip
Giuseppe Maccari Camera Operator
Lorraine Roberson Hair Supervisor
Peter Borkent Driver
Richard Portman Sound Re-Recording Mixer
George R. Nelson Set Decoration
Anthea Sylbert Costume Design
Joe L. Cramer Production Manager
Larry Jost Sound Recordist
Rodolfo Bramucci Gaffer
Dan Wallin Scoring Mixer
Gordon Arnell Unit Publicist
Giuseppe Rotunno Director of Photography
Sam O'Steen Editor
Mary Ellen Mark Still Photographer
Charles H. Schram Makeup Supervisor
Joseph E. Levine Presenter
Richard Sylbert Production Designer
Name Title
Mike Nichols Producer
Joseph E. Levine Executive Producer
Clive Reed Associate Producer
Organization Category Person
Popularity Metrics

Popularity History


Year Month Avg Max Min
2024 4 16 22 10
2024 5 18 32 13
2024 6 16 43 5
2024 7 14 21 8
2024 8 13 22 8
2024 9 9 14 6
2024 10 13 23 8
2024 11 11 23 6
2024 12 13 31 8
2025 1 14 22 7
2025 2 8 13 3
2025 3 5 11 1
2025 4 2 4 1
2025 5 1 4 1
2025 6 1 2 1
2025 7 1 2 1
2025 8 1 2 1
2025 9 1 2 1
2025 10 2 3 1
2025 11 1 3 0
2025 12 1 2 0
2026 1 1 1 0
2026 2 1 1 0

Trending Position


Year Month High Avg
2025 8 920 920
Year Month High Avg
2025 7 225 610
Year Month High Avg
2025 6 288 549
Year Month High Avg
2025 3 642 804

Return to Top

Reviews

Wuchak
6.0

**_Psychological study of the romantic lives of two males over the course of 25 years_** In the late 1940s, Two roommates at Amherst College (Jack Nicholson and Art Garfunkel) exchange personal info about their sextivities with various women as the years progress to the early ’70s. The female cas ... t includes Candice Bergen, Ann-Margret, Cynthia O'Neal, Carol Kane and Rita Moreno. “Carnal Knowledge” (1971) is not a conventional look at college life in the manner of the later “Small Circle of Friends” or “The ’70s.” Rather, it’s a sometimes depressing, sometimes amusing chronicling of the evolution and devolution of the sexual lives of two college friends, one a smooth-talking narcissist (Nicholson) and the other a sensitive nice guy (Garfunkel). Their friendship and discussions are reminiscent of Jerry Seinfeld and George Costanza in the 90s, just more edgy and not as funny. When released, the counterculture revolution of the late 60s was still fresh and nudity was the hip thang, which explains the skinny-dipping sequence in "Woodstock" and, a year later, the nudity in this flick and "The Last Picture Show,” as well as the soon-to-come "Stigma" and “The Harrad Experiment.” Of course, nudity in mainstream movies was nothing new in light of the pre-Hays era, as observed by "Tarzan and His Mate" from 1934. With the code lifted after almost three decades, movies like this seemed to exult in a new sense of libertine freedom. Whilst risqué and cutting edge at the time, it's just a quirky adult-oriented drama today. Nicholson has his likable smirk, as usual, but as the story progresses his character becomes increasingly distasteful and pathetic. Reflect on where he ends up; it’s a powerful point. Garfunkel’s character isn’t anywhere as bad, but he also becomes somewhat pitiable. “Meaningless! Meaningless! Everything is meaningless.” Although the story is sometimes tedious and there are distasteful elements, the cast is great and the psychological insights interesting. It runs 1 hour, 39 minutes, and was shot in New York City and at Panorama Film Studios in Vancouver. GRADE: B-

May 04, 2025
Geronimo1967
7.0

“Jonathan” (Jack Nicholson) is having a pep talk with his bright-eyed roommate “Sandy” (Art Garfunkel) about the latter’s nervous interest in “Susan” (Candice Bergen). Their conversations now proceed to give us a blow by blow description of the evolution of their burgeoning romance, only for “Jonath ... an” to jump the gun and start an affair of his own with her! They keep that a secret from “Sandy” for a while, and indeed the three become a regular social group, but all the while duplicity is never far away. Indeed, throughout their lives it seems that one is “borrowing” from another - until “Bobbie” (Ann-Margret) appears on the scene and offers “Jonathan” a chance to shack-up with someone. She’s a larger than life character who, in reality, craves certainty. An husband, a child, an home. Thing is, though, with “Sandy” now courting the imposing “Cindy” (Cynthia O’Neal) the whole cycle appears set to start again. Are either of these men ever going to settle down, to find stability and happiness, or is this love triangle scenario destined to prevail to old age? Garfunkel delivers quite well here as the generous spirited and sensitive young lad, but it’s really Nicholson who steals the show as the flawed and obnoxious creature who makes hay when the sun shines, but gradually finds himself becoming lonelier and bereft of that which he craves most. Perhaps it’s because there is so much descriptive dialogue of their peccadilloes, but at times it can come across as a combination of the predatory and the sexually sterile but the roles from Bergen and especially the troubled Ann-Margret give this quite a punch. It’s often photographed like it’s a documentary with us looking head on, unaware of who is speaking, or who is listening, or even who else is the room at all. I found it really quite easy to take a dislike to “Jonathan”, but as it progresses I began to feel a bit of pity, and that’s a testament to some skilful acting and potent writing. It’s interesting that there is female nudity a-plenty here, but Nicholson is noticeably always shielded by a pot plant, or a towel or even some steam!

Sep 20, 2025